About

We only work with government contractors

GovOpsHQ exists because federal contracting is not a generic industry with a few extra forms. The evaluation rules, compliance obligations, and margin structure are specific — and so is the software and implementation work required to make AI pay off.

See the platform

Our focus

Depth in one industry, not breadth across many

Most contractors we meet have already tried general-purpose AI. It writes fluent prose that fails a compliance check, invents past performance details, and cannot tell a capture manager whether a set-aside is achievable. The problem is not model quality — it is missing context and missing process.

We build for the operators who carry pipeline and delivery risk: capture leads deciding where to spend a limited B&D budget, proposal managers protecting a submission date, compliance leaders preparing for a C3PAO assessment, and founders who are still the last reviewer on everything.

That focus is why our roadmap looks like a contracting lifecycle instead of a feature list — and why implementation is part of the offering rather than an upsell.

Industry served

Federal government contractors only

Typical client size

20 – 1,500 employees

Core disciplines

Capture, proposals, contracts, compliance, operations

Engagement model

Platform + implementation + fractional leadership

Principles

How GovOpsHQ makes decisions

Outcomes over demos

Every engagement and every module is tied to win rate, cycle time, risk reduction, or margin. If we cannot measure it, we do not claim it.

Compliance is a design input

CUI handling, flow-downs, evidence, and audit trails are built into the workflow, not bolted on after a customer asks how you use AI.

Domain depth beats model novelty

Section L and M structure, CPARS language, CDRLs, SPRS scores, and set-aside rules are the hard part — not the model.

Adoption is the product

Software that a proposal manager abandons in week three has negative ROI. We install process and habits alongside the platform.